THE
IMPACT OF DIVORCE ON SDA COUPLES
by Bryan Craig
Divorce is almost always a disaster! It affects all those involved
for the rest of their lives in ways we can hardly imagine. It
is fair to say that no one ever emerges from a divorce unscathed
or unaffected.
Divorce
is an exceedingly stressful event that tends to impact women more
so than it does men. The stress involved affects the one who is
"left" more than the one who "leaves". Divorce
can impair an individual's emotional wellbeing for at least five
years after the event, producing a greater variety of long lasting
negative feelings that even the death of the partner does not
produce.
Legally,
divorce is a single event, but socially, emotionally, and psychologically
it is a chain of events, relocations, and radically changed relationships
that result in broken families, changed lifestyles, economic hardships
and a series of transitions that challenge, disrupt and modify
the lives of individuals, promoting growth for some, and exposing
personal vulnerability's for others. While the word divorce implies
finality, it needs to be recognized that divorce is a process
that begins with a failing marital relationship and lasts long
after what is probably the greatest emotional pain an individual
will experience in life - the decision to separate and divorce.
Long
Term Consequences of Divorce
The post-divorce period with its emphasis on coping, survival,
and recovery leads individuals into a radically altered lifestyle
and the development of a significantly revised sense of personal
identity. Research shows that the long term consequences of divorce
are:
1.
Altered Family Structures
Divorce radically alters the structure of the family. It creates
tense conflicts and divided loyalties. It forces parents to drastically
adjust their parenting roles and embroils extended family members
in a battle to reaffirm loyalties and realign alliances.
2.
Psychological and Emotional Trauma
The emotional trauma that occurs during the crisis of separation
and divorce is enormously disruptive and debilitating. The sense
of failure and loss that accompanies the marital breakdown frequently
results in feelings of intense disappointment, bitterness, loneliness,
dislocation and depression. The feelings of inadequacy and abandonment
can be overwhelming.
Research suggests that people who divorce constitute much higher
risks for both psychiatric and physical disease. The experience
of high levels of stress can lower the immune system's ability
to protect the individual from infection and disease. The ongoing
conflict and anger between the couple may lead to higher levels
of stress and frustration and contribute to a loss of self confidence,
lower self esteem and feelings of hurt, resentment, remorse and
depression.
Judith
Wallerstein's research highlighted the fact that men and women
tend to remain intensely angry with the former spouse for many
years after the break up (50 per cent of men, and 33 per cent
of women were still angry 5-10 years after the divorce). Other
research shows that family members continue to engage in escalating
cycles of conflict and coercion long after the marriage is over
and the family has split up.
3.
Social Dislocation and Diminished Financial Resources
The breakdown of the marriage relationship inevitably leads to
the disintegration and relocation of the family and a "downward
mobility" of the family lifestyle with individuals being
impacted by the change of economic and social conditions. The
parent who has custody of the children (usually the mother) more
often than not ends up as a struggling single parent with drastically
diminished financial and material resources. The economic degradation
that accompanies divorce is frustrating and humiliating for both
parties. The re-location of family members also means a change
in their social networks of support, and a loss of contact with
family and friends which serves only to isolate individuals more,
resulting in further hurt, jealousy and anger.
4.
Distressed and Confused Children
Children are the innocent victims of divorce - the real losers
(they lose their family, their security, their identity, and their
protection). They have no say in a decision that profoundly affects
the rest of their lives. As psychiatrist Carl Whittaker says,
"When children are involved, there is no such thing as a
divorce. The battles over parenting, access, maintenance and custody,
don't end with the legal granting of a divorce. Children end up
being innocent bystanders who secretly hope that one day Mom and
Dad will reunite and the emptiness they feel will go away."
According
to Californian psychologist Judith Wallerstein, children continue
to suffer the emotional repercussions 25 years after their parents
divorce. She claims that the effect of the divorce is played and
replayed throughout the first three decades of the child's life
and that its impact is both long lasting and cumulative. Wallerstein
found that the biggest factor affecting the adjustment of children
was not the divorce itself, but the psychological health of the
parents and their involvement with the children.
Plenty
of evidence exists to suggest that children from divorced families
are put at greater risk for a variety of emotional and behavioral
problems including, oppositional or avoidant behaviors, acting
out behaviors, aggression, and symptoms of depression, anxiety
and low self esteem.
Fifty
per cent of children enter adulthood as worried, angry, and self
depreciating. Both boys and girls have trouble establishing and
maintaining love relationships, with close to 40 per cent needing
relationship therapy. Daughters of divorce are likely to develop
attention-seeking behaviors, be sexually unhappy, anxious and
depressed, and feel a profound lack of control over their lives.
Sons of divorce take longer to adjust and tend to become more
sexually aggressive, exhibit antisocial behaviors, and have more
learning difficulties at school.
The
Impact of Divorce on Spiritual Life
A recent study reported in the Journal of Divorce and Remarriage
(Volume 22, 1995) shows that, of those surveyed, only 17 per cent
reported a decrease in their spiritual lives due to their divorce.
Eighty-three per cent said that the divorce experience had ultimately
strengthened their spirituality. This suggests that a significant
spiritual vacuum and openness to God exists for those who experience
divorce.
The
study, which included people from a wide range of Protestant and
Catholic Churches in the United States, also showed that 42 per
cent of people changed their religious affiliation as a result
of their divorce, and that the majority of those who had made
a change seem to be doing the best spiritually. Thirty-three per
cent of women surveyed indicated that their divorce was a catalyst
for changing their religious understandings.
The
Impact of the Church's Response
The way in which the church responds to individuals and couples
during the time of their separation and divorce appears to have
a significant impact on them and their view of the church as a
supportive community. Two separate studies conducted in the South
Pacific Division (SPD), and in the North American Division (NAD)
have found that 50 per cent of those surveyed dropped out of the
church after their divorce. In the SPD study it was found that
all these people had left the church within three years of their
divorce. In the NAD study, 17 per cent had already quit attending
prior to the time of their divorce, and another 17 per cent had
stopped attending either at the time of the divorce or during
its aftermath.
Frequently
the local church and its ministry leaders find it difficult to
know how they might respond to people who are experiencing marital
distress and the break up of their family. Congregations appear
to be quickly drawn into "taking sides" or, on the other
hand, to see intervention and support as an intrusion into the
private lives of the couple and the family. Several studies have
shown that one of the most significant factors that seems to influence
positive adjustment in divorce is whether or not the church is
perceived to be an accepting, supportive and healing community.
In
1997, the Adventist Institute of Family Relations in Australia
was involved in conducting a qualitative research project among
divorced members of the church to understand the nature of their
experience in divorce, to assess their attitude towards the church's
policy on divorce and remarriage, and to discover how they felt
the church responded to their marital crises. The following responses
give some indication of the way in which many individuals surveyed
felt about the church's response to them during their marital
crisis. Many of them said they felt unsupported, misunderstood
and betrayed, at a time when they were looking to the church for
help.
"The
church responded poorly. I received no help and no support. The
pastor never even raised the issue with me. No one spoke to me.
No one knew what to say or how to handle the issue. I have been
so distraught for so long, yet I've never talked to anyone. I've
just bottled up my feelings. I am too embarrassed and scared to
risk opening up. I feel lonely, betrayed, rejected, and even a
bit resentful. . . I was forced to change churches because I couldn't
face going there. I felt so vulnerable. I guess I've roamed for
years trying to find a spiritual home."
"I felt shame, rejection, and inadequacy, but the church
was happy to pretend the crisis wasn't happening. But there was
no response. The first response I got was a letter forbidding
me to form another relationship. It said I was unfortunate to
be divorced, but I was in no way free to remarry and remain a
member of the church. If I hadn't have had incredible support
from my family and friends I would have left the church then and
there."
"I felt judged by the church - without a hearing! No one
wanted to hear my story. No one wanted to hear the truth. They
had taken sides without knowing anything about our story. So,
I left - "guilty". I felt totally negated as a person.
The sense of failure and disapproval was pretty tough to handle.
I felt like I hadn't "tried hard enough". That I was
so sinful in their eyes. I felt the total hypocrisy of their hospitality.
My church, that claims to care about people, the place where you
bring strangers to love - had violated my trust and failed to
offer me any compassion."
"The response from the church to my marital crisis was negligible.
The minister, when he did visit me, was decidedly uncomfortable
and said very little about being separated. When I became a single
parent I was isolated from the church as if I was diseased. When
I came as a divorcee to seek permission to remarry, I got the
distinct impression that the church was more concerned about its
image than it was about my welfare. I guess I didn't realize just
how Calvinistic the church is - so puritanical, rule bound, predetermined
in the way that it deals with people."
The
emotional reactions of those surveyed include a variety of feelings
that range from rejection and misunderstanding to dismay, disgust
and outrage. Several individuals felt a sense of shame that they
had let their extended family down, and that they were an embarrassment
to the "good name" of the church. Some were obviously
distressed at still being able to access their pain and anger
when they recalled how they "cried for help," but no
one was there for them. A majority of respondents indicated that
this was the first time anyone from the church had bothered to
ask them how they had dealt with their divorce.
While
there are a number of factors that influence the way in which
individuals go about resolving the social dislocation and emotional
trauma created by separation and divorce, e.g., personality, social
skills, level of self esteem and self confidence, ways of handling
conflict and stress, ways of perceiving the church, one theme
was dominant in the responses of those surveyed. Nearly everyone
felt bewildered by the reactions of embarrassment, disapproval,
and non-acceptance from church members towards their marital crisis.
There was an almost universal sense of profound sadness over what
had happened and feelings of disappointment and abandonment that
no one seemed to know what to do or how to respond.
The
way in which the church so often responds to marital crisis seems
to have a deep and lasting effect on the individuals involved.
When asked to describe what their relationship to the church has
been like since their separation and divorce, many indicated that
their view of the church had undergone radical change. They typically
felt angry about the way people had treated them, cynical and
skeptical about the church as an organization, and unsure that
they could see themselves continuing to make a substantial contribution
to an organization that had essentially shunned them. Some expressed
the fact that this treatment felt like a "second injury"
- first they had been rejected by their partner, now by their
church family.
Of
further concern is the way in which most described the impact
that the church's response has had on their children. Many found
it difficult to express the magnitude of their grief over the
way in which their children had become so bitter about and estranged
from Christianity - an estrangement that has taken more than a
decade for most of them to work through.
Interestingly
enough, while individuals' attitudes towards the church may have
changed dramatically, so too had their relationship to God. Almost
all those interviewed expressed that their relationship to God
had become stronger, and that their ability to appreciate and
embrace the grace of God had deepened. Some said that they felt
more committed, loyal, and willing to trust God because they had
discovered that He was always there for them, even though their
church family wasn't. Some had felt pushed towards a more interdenominational
stance in their personal spiritual journey, while others clearly
found it easier to worship with another congregation, either inside
or outside the Adventist community. One of the points of great
anguish for several of the people interviewed was that even a
decade or more after their divorce and their subsequent remarriage,
they had still not been offered a single church office in their
local congregation. This had further contributed to their feelings
of exclusion, low self-esteem and non-acceptance.
Reactions
to Requests for Permission to Remarry
A variety of responses were received from individuals when asked
the question, "What reaction did you get from the church
when you requested permission to remarry and maintain your membership
within the church". Most were highly offended by the process
to which they were subjected the church. Some were still clearly
upset over the sense of intrusiveness and the invasion of their
privacy by the church board or conference committee that sought
to reopen all the issues surrounding the breakdown of the marriage,
and their separation and divorce in order to come to a decision.
This process was described as "humiliating", "intimidating",
"impersonal". Many felt that doubt and suspicion was
once again cast upon them as an individual as the church sought
to establish "guilt" and assign "blame". Individuals
said they felt "pressured and grilled" to come up with
the evidence. One person said he was reluctant to embarrass his
ex-wife and felt himself embarrassed and humiliated by the whole
process. He felt that the whole situation was handled and resolved
politically rather then personally. Others were angry over the
fact that it took so long (in one case two years) for a "verdict"
to be handed down. Still others were frustrated and incensed over
the fact the path to resolution was "so foggy and unclear".
It
was acknowledged by quite a number of respondents that the conference
administration seemed quite awkward and embarrassed over the whole
process and that they were relieved when they could find clear
evidence that a "guilty partner" provided the biblical
grounds to approve remarriage.
References
Hart, A. (1989). Children and divorce. Dallas, TX: Word
Inc. Publishers.
Hartin, W. (1977). Divorce dilemma. Melbourne, Australia:
Hill of Content Publishing Company.
Kaslow, F., & Schwartz, L. (1987). The Dynamics of divorce.
New York: Brunner/Mazel Inc. Publishers.
McKay, Rogers, Blades, & Gosse (1984). The divorce book.
Oakland, CA: New Harbingers Publications.
Sahlin, M., & Sahlin, N. (1997). A new generation of Adventist
families. Portland, OR: Centre for Creative Ministry.
Schwartz, L. (1992). Children's perception of divorce. American
Journal of Family Therapy 20, (4).
Volgy, S. (1991). Women and divorce/men and divorce - gender
differences in separation, divorce and remarriage. London:
Haworth Press Inc.
Wallerstein, J., & Blakelee, S. (1990). Second chances.
London: Corgi Books.
Wegscheider-Cruse, S. (1994). Life after divorce. Deerfield,
FL: Health Communications Inc.
Weiss, R. (1975). Marital separation. New York: Basic Books
Inc. Publishers.
_______________________
Bryan Craig
is the Director of Family Ministries for the South Pacific Division.