|
BROTHER
BELOVED
by
Karen & Ron Flowers
Directors, Department of Family
Ministries, General Conference
2000
| Theme:
The gospel offers new beginnings for estranged relationships. |
| Theme
Text: John 15:12; Philemon 15, 16. Supplementary
Reading: Ellen G. White, Acts of the Apostles, pp. 456-460. |
| Presentation
Notes: The notes presented in this section do not constitute
a prepared sermon script. The following helps are designed to
offer a framework, supportive resources, and illustrations toward
the development of a sermon or sermons on a stated theme. You
will want to shape these ideas in your own style, drawing upon
your own study and experience to meet the particular needs of
your congregation. Throughout the following outline, numbers
in parentheses (1), (2), (3) will indicate illustrations, quotations
and other material that may be helpful in your sermon development
and delivery. These helps can be found in the Sermon Illumination
section. |
In the collection
of writings we call the New Testament, there is a small letterwe
might even call it a "postcard"with a big, big message.
It is the letter of Paul to Philemon. It is the shortest of all
his epistles (only 334 words in the Greek text), but it is among
his most profound. Its message is about reconciliation, about the
bringing back together again of individuals estranged from each
other. It is about offering forgiveness and a new beginning to someone
whom the law condemned as deserving severe punishment, perhaps even
death.
Historical Background of the Letter
The Epistle to Philemon is one of the four Prison Epistles, which
also include Ephesians, Philippians and Colossians. The letters
to the Ephesians, Colossians and Philemon were written around 62
A.D. by the apostle Paul from his place of imprisonment in Rome.
They were hand-carried by Tychicus, a companion of Paul, on a journey
to the churches of Ephesus and Colossae in Asia. The epistle to
Philemon is a personal epistle written to Philemon, a Christian
in Colossae. Philemon was a convert of Paul (Philem.19), perhaps
through an encounter of the two men in Ephesus during Paul's third
missionary journey (54-57 A.D.). Philemon owned a house large enough
for a meeting place for the church. In fact, the "church in
your house" (Philem. 2) is addressed in the salutation of the
letter, along with Philemon's wife, Apphia, and his grown son, Archippus,
who evidently held a position of ministry in the church (Col. 4:1).
Like many other
wealthy citizens in Colossae, including Christian believers, Philemon
was a slaveholder. (1), (2) Since Paul acknowledges the good which
Philemon has done among the believers (many of whom were probably
slaves) (Philem. 5-7), it is likely that, among Christian slaveholders,
the plight of slaves was better than in the society at large. However,
the system of slavery as a whole was "hopelessly degrading"
(Acts of the Apostles, p. 459).
With
full control over the souls and bodies of these helpless beings,
he [the slave owner] could inflict upon them any suffering he chose.
If one of them in retaliation or self-defense ventured to raise
a hand against his owner, the whole family of the offender might
be inhumanly sacrificed. The slightest mistake, accident, or carelessness
was often punished without mercy (Acts of the Apostles, p.
459).
We might be
tempted to wonder why such inhumane practices were not condemned
outrightly in the New Testament. The answer lies in the "wise
as serpents, harmless as doves" (Matt. 10:16) philosophy which
both Christ and the apostles employed as they went about their mission.
Paul did not assault the social structure of his day directly, but
he presented viewpoints and perspectives that would alter human
hearts and reshape relationships from inside families and the community
of faith. He was confident that Christian believers, under the guidance
of the Spirit, would steadily grow into conformity to the will of
God. (3), (4)
The Story Behind the Letter
Onesimus, a slave from Philemon's household, had robbed or in some
other way wronged his master and had escaped. Like many such slave
runaways, he had found his way to the sprawling capital city of
Rome, hoping to lose himself amid the masses. Just how he encountered
Paul there is uncertain. He may have been destitute and looked for
Christians, whom he understood to be kind and helpful. He may have
been driven by guilt and seeking some inner peace in the Christian
community. Or he may have looked for Paul directly, no doubt having
heard Philemon speak of him. Onesimus may even have known of Paul's
imprisonment in Rome.
The encounter with Paul was life-changing for Onesimus, for as he
listened to the words of life from the aging prisoner for Christ,
he confessed his sins and was converted. Onesimus became involved
in caring for Paul and helping to spread the gospel. His conscience
was awakened to his responsibility to repent and make as much restitution
as he could to Philemon for the wrongs he had done. Paul would have
liked to have retained Onesimus in his service, but both knew he
was a fugitive felon under Roman law and liable for severe punishment,
perhaps even death, if caught. It became increasingly clear he could
not continue to work for Christ until his debt back in Colossae
was cared for. He must return to Philemon. Paul counseled him to
do so without delay, to make his apology in the hope that things
could be set right.
What we have in our Bibles is the note of recommendation which Paul
prepared to accompany Onesimus as he went back to Philemon. Having
also written letters for the Ephesian and Colossian churches, the
apostle entrusted them, and Onesimus, to Tychicus. The two then
set out on the journey to Asia Minor. "It was a severe test
for this servant thus to deliver himself up to the master he had
wronged; but he had been truly converted, and he did not turn aside
from this duty" (Acts of the Apostles, p. 456).
Christian
Diplomacy
The letter has been hailed as masterful in its tact, its sensitivity
and its skillful handling of a difficult situation. Ellen White
notes that Paul knew "that Philemon was greatly incensed because
of the conduct of his servant" (Acts of the Apostles,
p. 457, 458). Paul mentions that he has heard of Philemon's service
to the church and his witnessing (vss. 5, 6). Did he also hear of
Philemon's displeasure at the runaway Onesimus? Or did Paul simply
know intuitively that anyone who had been thus wronged would be
angry? There is no way to know for certain. In any case, Paul is
very courteous in this letter. He shows loving concern for both
Philemon and Onesimus. For those of us helping restore estranged
relationships in the family, there are many lessons in this letter
about the delicate work of what we might call "Christian diplomacy."
Expressing respect, love and affection. To Paul, Philemon
is "beloved," a "fellow worker" (vs. 1). Paul
has prayed for Philemon, thanking God for him (vs. 4, 5) and asking
God that Philemon's faith will grow and that his witnessing will
be effective (vs. 6). They are bonded together in Christ. Philemon
is a "brother" (vs. 7, 20).
Giving genuine affirmation and appreciation. Philemon is
widely known for his magnanimity and general helpfulness. Paul's
affirmation and appreciation for Philemon is real. Philemon's devoted
Christian faith and service has been inspirational, a source of
encouragement and joy to Paul (vs. 7).
Making an appeal rather than giving an order. Paul makes
his apostolic authority clear (see 1 Cor. 9; 2 Cor. 10, 11). With
Philemon, however, he deliberately chooses not to use apostolic
authority to command, but rather to make an appeal on the basis
of love (vss. 8, 9). Paul's appeal respects Philemon's will and
power of choice. Such an appeal is more likely to enlist Philemon's
cooperation than would a direct order. Without freedom of choice,
Philemon's response would not have been voluntary. (5) A similar
idea is expressed later in the letter when Paul says, "I did
not want to do anything without your consent, so that any favor
you do will be spontaneous and not forced" (vs. 14). An appeal
also recognizes that the individual who has been wronged feels hurt,
injured, used. In response to an appeal, the feelings of someone
like Philemon are more likely to be processed in a positive way.
With a command, resistance is more likely.
Reflections
of the Great Intercessor
Paul does not compare his intercession for Onesimus with that of
Christ for sinners. But in this letter we can see his efforts in
the arena of human relationships as a type of Christ's work as mediator
between God and humankind (1 Tim. 2:5). Paul's work as an intercessor
also shows us how God uses people as His helpers to bring about
the reconciliation of one human being to another, a restoration
of relationships made possible because of Christ's sacrifice on
the cross (Gal. 2:28; Eph. 2:13-19).
He serves as an advocate. The word appeal (vss. 9,
10) comes from the same Greek root word as the names given to the
Holy Spirit (John 14:26) and to Jesus (1 John 2:1), i.e., "one
called alongside another to help," "to comfort,"
"to be an advocate." Paul is an advocate for Onesimus.
He offers himself to the one wronged as surety for the wrongdoer.
"If he has done you any wrong or owes you anything, charge
it to me. I, Paul, am writing this with my own hand. I will pay
it back . . ." (vss. 18, 19). (6)
How
fitting an illustration of the love of Christ for the repentant
sinner! The servant who had defrauded his master had nothing with
which to make restitution. The sinner who has robbed God of years
of service has no means of canceling the debt. Jesus interposes
between the sinner and God, saying, I will pay the debt. Let the
sinner be spared; I will suffer in his stead (Acts of the Apostles,
p. 458).
He is close
to both sides. Onesimus he calls "my son" (vs. 10),
"my very heart" (vs. 12). Philemon he calls "fellow
worker" (vs. 1), "brother" (vs. 7, 20), and "partner"
(vs. 17). "So if you consider me a partner, welcome him as
you would welcome me" (vs. 17). This is the climax of his advocacy,
his mediation, his substitution and intercession for Onesimus. His
close relationship with them both is what he trusts will make possible
a restored relationship between Philemon and Onesimus. "From
the standpoint of his legal rights Philemon could proceed with other
action than that which Paul suggests. But Paul rises above mere
justice and rests his case on the summit of love" (SDA Bible
Commentary, Vol. 7, p. 383).
He presents each to the other as worthy of trust. Trust erodes
between individuals when wrongs are done. The restoration of trust
is a necessary part of reconciliation. Paul acknowledges that Onesimus,
whose name means "useful," has not formerly lived up to
his name. But he declares that he has changed and become truly useful
(vs. 11), so useful that he would liked to have retained him as
a personal attendant in Rome (vs. 13). Paul has already acknowledged
many positive qualities about Philemon. These he must have likewise
impressed upon Onesimus. That he inspired Onesimus' heart with hope
and trust in Philemon is shown in part by the renegade slave's willingness
to return to his master. If he had not, Onesimus might have asked
to remain in Rome until Tychicus had delivered Paul's letter and
some word had come back from Philemon to Paul.
Toward Reconciliation
The first good news of the gospel is that God has already brought
about perfect reconciliation between Himself and the human race.
"God . . . reconciled us to himself through Christ . . ."
(2 Cor. 5:18). But the gospel also contains the truth that members
of the human race, estranged by sin, have been brought together
in Christ. The human to human reconciliation and unity for which
Jesus prayed (John 17:11), was also accomplished in His body on
the cross (Eph. 2:13-19). "There is neither Jew nor Greek,
slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus"
(Gal. 3:28). These are valid spiritual realities, accomplished by
God Himself apart from any human doing, which await our acceptance.
Objective reconciliation: Brothers in Christ. In this epistle,
Paul addresses two very complex levels of human reconciliation.
The first is what we can call objective reconciliation. It
deals with a reconciliation between Philemon and Onesimus which
is outside their personal experience. It is something Christ has
accomplished already. All believers are brothers and sisters in
Christ. Paul must help Philemon to see that because of Christ, he
and Onesimus are already reconciled; they are Christian brothers.(7,
8) Paul reveals this truth when he indicates that Onesimus is coming
back, no longer as a slave, but better than a slave, as a dear
brother" (v15, 16). The words "better than" (vs.
16) are from the same Greek word which is translated "above"
in Luke 6:40 ("above his teacher") and Phil. 2:9
("above every name"). In other words, Onesimus
is above a slave. What Paul is saying is that, in Christ,
believers have a new status, an elevated status. They are "brothers"
and "sisters" in the family of God. Fellow believers see
each other through new glasses, as it were, and love each other
as members of one family. Paul builds on the thought that he expressed
in another letter carried by Tychicus, the letter to the Ephesians,
a church where there were also slaveholders. There he points out
that with God there is no partiality between those who are called
masters and slaves in earthly society (Eph. 6:9). Paul is presenting
to Philemon a radical reconciliation, that of finding in Onesimus
a beloved brother.
This news that Christ has reconciled estranged human beings directs
the thoughts of one who has been wounded heavenward. Christ our
Savior has felt our sorrow. He recognizes the need for justice,
and He has personally taken upon Himself the punishment due the
wrongdoer. He "carried our sorrows . . . He was crushed for
our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him,
and by his wounds we are healed" (Isa. 53:4, 5). "God
made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might
become the righteousness of God" (2 Cor. 5:21). That good news
alone can begin the stirring in our hearts that is necessary for
us to reach out to one another. "Dear friends, since God so
loved us, we also ought to love one another" (1 John 4:11).
This truth is one which must echo beyond the walls of Philemon's
home. The acceptance of this radical reconciliation will bring to
an end all use of power that would enslave or subjugate people wherever
they are found. It heralds the end of patriarchy, of benevolent
autocracy and other seemingly benign leadership forms that nevertheless
insinuate that others are inferior. Because of Christ, a fellowship
now exists that knows no such distinctions. Christ has forever banished
the barriers of ethnicity, social and economic class, and gender
stratification (Gal. 3:28). Today, the message of Christ has reached
into many parts of the world and slavery as an institution is officially
banned. However, the desire to control others still exists in hearts
that have not yielded to Christ. These verses of Philemon tell us
that there must be a radical change in the conduct of Christian
companies and business owners toward their employees. People must
always be placed above profit. Also to come under scrutiny in the
light of these verses are those social forceswhether religious,
political, domestic, or commercialthat dominate and repress
women, children, the poor and disadvantaged, and that grind down
certain people groups.
Subjective reconciliation: Choosing to restore a damaged relationship.
The second level of reconciliation we might call subjective reconciliation.
It deals with the personal, subjective experience of coming back
into relationship with someone who has wronged you. That wrong might
be any one of a number of thingsphysical or emotional wounding
or the inflicting of damage, loss or hurt to one's family or to
the things one holds dear. Reconciliation must address the hurt
and broken trust, the sense of violation of the promises which bind
us together.
Already we have seen how the awareness of Christ's bearing the punishment
for transgressions against us can help to bring a sense of justice
and prepare our hearts for healing the wounded relationship. The
letter to Philemon also shows us that this work of reconciliation
in human hearts is not one to be commanded. It must be the voluntary
choice of the one who has been deeply hurt. Nor is it a process
to be rushed. Christian counselor Gary Rosberg says, "Conflict
settlement needs to follow a process, and it often takes time"
(1992, p. 232).
When an offense occurs, it hurts. Hurt is often followed by anger.
Rosberg describes such experiences as profoundly affecting the relationship
"loop" between the two persons involved. In a close relationship,
their "relationship loop" which binds them together would
be kept intact, with communication and love flowing freely between
them. But because of the hurtful offence, the "loop" that
has held them together in relationship has suffered a breach; it
has been torn open.
At this point
the individuals are faced with a choice. They may choose to sustain
the break and keep the loop open. In this case, the problem which
resulted in the breach in their relationships may never be addressed
or resolved. Choosing to keep the loop open may be necessary to provide
opportunity for the one who has been hurt deeply to make a decision
about the level of relationship they are able or that it safe to sustain
with the other person for the future. On the other hand, the persons
involved may wish to repair the breach and close the loop, whatever
it takes. To close the loop and restore a relationship that has sustained
damage requires a process with a number of steps:
Choosing to love again. Before the breach can be repaired,
the persons involved must reaffirm their commitment to the relationship
and to God and choose to enter into the process of reconciliation,
trusting God for help in resolving the problem.
Preparing the heart. Preparation of the hearts of
each individual is important before entering into dialogue with
one another. This is a time for meditation, Bible study and prayer.
A time for confession of one's own personal need of grace. It is
a time for introspection and consideration of the underlying causes
of the problem to which each individual may be contributing. It
is a time for deciding the relationship takes priority over conflict
issues.
Communicating. For conflicts to be resolved, the persons
involved must talk. Both must make a commitment to listening and
understanding, to really hearing the other person. The thoughts
and feelings and needs of both must be expressed.
Loving confrontation. When approaching the other person,
it is important to be sensitive to the pressures they may be feeling
and to request a time to talk about the problem together. Choosing
an unhurried time and setting, avoiding exaggerated accusationssuch
as those using words like "never" and "always"and
shifting the approach from "you" to "I"that
is, from blaming the other person to sharing one's own feelingsset
the stage for understanding and resolution to the problem. Sometimes
communication and loving confrontation are all that are necessary.
Sometimes there is a need to explore alternatives for resolving
the problem in a way that meets the needs of both. It is important
to take the time to generate options until an alternative can be
found that is satisfying to each. If this alternative turns out
not to be as acceptable as anticipated, both must remain open to
adjustments. This process can be very difficult for the two persons
most closely involved in a conflict to follow without assistance
from someone like a pastor or counselor who has the ability to help
them hear and understand one another and to generate and choose
among options. God has given gifts and opportunities for professional
training to members of the body of Christ. They can offer their
counsel and support to those seeking reconciliation.
Forgiving one another. Forgiveness cannot come until
hurt has been validated. It is necessary to move beyond denial and
acknowledge the depth of the pain. Validation prepares the way for
the person who has been hurt to turn from revenge, retribution and
resentment and make the choice to forgive. Validation opens the
way for the offender to enter into the pain that he or she has brought
into the life of the person they have wounded. It prepares the way
for the full repentance of the wrongdoer. This repentance includes
accepting responsibility for the pain that has been caused, saying,
"I was wrong; I am sorry. I don't every want to hurt you in
this way again." Such repentance also involves making restitution
in every way possible, changing in behavior, and seeking the help
of others to avoid inflicting such hurt in the future. Genuine repentance
and forgiveness in response provides both giver and receiver with
emotional relief.(9)
Rebuilding trust. For true restoration to occur, there
must be a work of rebuilding trust. The passing of time alone is
not enough, but positive experiences and perseverance in restoring
the relationship over time can eventually result in trust regained.
God does not leave us to walk this path alone. He is the God of
restoration and reconciliation.
The journey
of repentance. The journey from Rome to Colossae in Paul's day
was a long and difficult journey. Paul sent Tychicus as a companion
for Onesimus (Col. 4:7-9). One commentator notes that there were
bounty hunters looking for renegade slaves, and travel would be
safer if Onesimus were not alone. There may be another reason Paul
sent Onesimus with a companion. He may have been concerned that
Onesimus might need support, lest he become faint of spirit, for
the long journey of Onesimus is nothing less than the journey of
the repentant. It is like the journey of the prodigal son back home,
with those desperate words on his lips, "I have sinned against
heaven and in your sight and am no longer worthy to be called your
son." What can he, a runaway slave, ever say to Philemon? What
can he do but offer his repentance? Will the note be received? These
thoughts must have played over and over in his mind as he trudged
forward during the long days and wakeful nights of the journey home.
But in those moments, in our mind's eye, we can see him put his
hand tenderly into the pocket where the note, the precious note
of intercession, was kept. In this act, we can imagine he turned
again and again for reassurance to Paul, the trusted friend of both
himself and his owner.
Conclusion
Here in our Bibles we have the very message sent by Paul in the
hand of Onesimus to Philemon. Did Onesimus complete the journey
from Rome back to Philemon? Did he deliver the letter? Did Philemon
respond as Paul requested? The answers must be yes. We do not know
what the reunion was like, or by what personal process Philemon
and Onesimus were reconciled. But the fact that this tiny letter
exists at all is the greatest testimony that what Paul appealed
for on the basis of the gospel actually came to pass.
Today, we are all, in one way or another, wrapped up in the drama
of this little letter. In so far as it symbolizes our standing before
God, we can rejoice at the really good news that we have been welcomed
home! No longer as slaves, but as adopted members of the family.
God accepts us in His Beloved Son (Eph. 1:6). In another sense,
we play out these characters in our families and other relationships.
Some of us are like Paul, trying very hard to mediate the difficulties
between people we love. We feel frustrated, confused or disappointed
by our lack of results sometimes. Perhaps the most important things
for us to remember from the letter to Philemon are that we can keep
on loving both sides and we can continue to appeal for peace. In
the realm of relationships we cannot force or coerce, we must leave
the choice to reconcile with the individuals themselves.
Some may be like Onesimus, perhaps still running, feeling guilty,
longing to repent and be reconciled. The experience of Onesimus
can fortify us with courage to confess our wrongs and seek reconciliation
with our God in heaven and with those whom we have wronged in our
families and elsewhere.
Some of us may be in Philemon's position today. We have been wronged.
The hurt runs deep. No offense is ever minor, but perhaps the damage
has been very extensive. You may feel angry, even punitive. There
may have been gestures of repentance from the offender, maybe not.
Perhaps the repentance seemed insincere. You don't know what to
do, but the situation is eating you alive.
Today the God of Paul, Onesimus and Philemon understands. Through
Christ He has entered the human arena and become familiar with our
pain. Because of Christ He has committed Himself to the process
of restoring damaged relationships. We can trust in the surety of
the reconciliation between earth and heaven, between ourselves and
Him. As we put our earthly human relationships in His hands, He
will surely lead us to know more fully the freeing experience of
forgiveness and, if it is at all possible, the renewal of reconciliation.
|
Sermon
Illumination
|
| One
(1): Slave-holding was an established institution
throughout the Roman Empire, and both masters and slaves were
found in most of the churches for which Paul labored. In the
cities, where slaves often greatly outnumbered the free population,
laws of terrible severity were regarded as necessary to keep
them in subjection. A wealthy Roman often owned hundreds of
slaves, of every rank, of every nation, and of every accomplishment.
(Acts of the Apostles, p. 459). |
| Two
(2): Without an understanding of the slave problem
as it existed in the Roman Empire of Paul's day, the Epistle
to Philemon cannot be fully appreciated. Slaves were a recognized
part of the social structure and were considered members of
their master's household. Between the years 146 B.C. and A.D.
235 the proportion of slaves to freemen is said to have been
three to one. Pliny says that in the time of Augustus a freeman
by the name of Caecilius held 4,116 slaves. (Seventh-day
Adventist Bible Commentary, Vol. 7, p. 376). |
| Three
(3): It was not the apostle's work to overturn arbitrarily
or suddenly the established order of society. To attempt this
would be to prevent the success of the gospel. But he taught
principles which struck at the very foundation of slavery and
which, if carried into effect, would surely undermine the whole
system. (Acts of the Apostles, pp. 459, 460). |
| Four
(4): The trenchant social inequalities of the culture surrounding
the New Testament church were thus undermined and transformed
by the grace and calling of Christ. Inequality and subordination
based on race, class, and sex were undermined in principle and
subverted in practice. The gospel called neither for a social
revolution nor for a passive acceptance of the status quo. Rather,
it initiated a transformation of social relations toward equality,
mutuality, and positive interdependence. (Van Leeuwen, 1993,
pp. 8, 11). |
Five
(5): Of the importance of choice, E. G. White expresses
the following regarding the choice given to humankind at the
beginning:
Without freedom of choice, his obedience would not have been
voluntary, but forced. There could have been no development
of character. Such a course would have been contrary to God's
plan in dealing with the inhabitants of other worlds. It would
have been unworthy of man as an intelligent being, and would
have sustained Satan's charge of God's arbitrary rule. (Patriarchs
and Prophets, p. 49). |
| Six
(6): Christ, like Paul, was willing to pay another's debt
so that the sinner may be received by all as though he had committed
no wrong. Therefore, when the repentant servant returned, Philemon
was not to see Onesimus and his debt, but Paul and his promise
of repayment. (SDA Bible Commentary, Vol. 7, p. 383). |
| Seven
(7): "Picture a large circle, from the edge of which
are many lines all running to the center. The nearer these lines
approach the center, the nearer they are to one another. Thus
it is in the Christian life. The closer we come to Christ, the
nearer we shall be to one another" (Ellen G. White, The
Adventist Home, 179). |
Eight
(8): "In the most intimate relationships of life, in
our kinship with father and mother, brothers and sisters, in
married love, and in our duty to the community, direct relationships
are impossible. Since the coming of Christ, his followers have
no more immediate realities of their own, not in their family
relationships. . . nor in the relationships formed in the process
of living. Between father and son, husband and wife . . . stands
Christ the Mediator, whether they are able to recognize him
or not. We cannot establish direct contact outside ourselves
except through him, through his word, and through our following
of him.
The same mediator who makes us individuals is also the founder
of a new fellowship. He stands in the centre between my neighbor
and myself. He divides, but he also unites. Thus although the
direct way to our neighbor is barred, we now find the new and
only real way to himthe way which passes through the Mediator"
(Bonhoeffer, 1959, p. 86). |
Nine
(9): Gary Rosberg (Choosing to Love Again, 1992,
pp. 223-232) reminds us that, contrary to popular myth:
God has the power to forget; we don't. We cannot
make ourselves forget something that has deeply hurt us. We
can ask God to ease our adjustment to the pain and our subsequent
memories.
Forgiveness is not impossible. Even when we don't
feel like forgiving, we can choose to offer it anyway, drawing
upon God's strength.
Even if the other person doesn't respond, we are responsible
for ourselves. We can try to close the loop, but we can't
control the other person's response. Sometimes humbly taking
the first step can start the process.
Forgiveness does not mean nothing happened. Forgiveness
is a gift, freely bestowed. Trust needs to be earned.
Forgiveness takes time. If the offense was minor,
the process may be shorter. If the offense was major, we need
to be prepared for a long process. We err only if we refuse
to enter the process. |
References
Bonhoeffer, D. (1959). The cost of discipleship. London:
SCM Press.
Nichol, F.
D. (Ed.). (1957). Seventh-day Adventist bible commentary, Vol.
7. Hagerstown, MD: Review and Herald Publishing Association.
Rosberg, G.
(1992). Choosing to love again. Colorado Springs, CO: Focus
on the Family Publishing.
Van Leeuwen,
M. S. (Ed.) (1993). After Eden: facing the challenge of gender
reconciliation. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing
Company.
White, E.
G. (1958). Patriarchs and prophets. Nampa, ID: Pacific Press
Publishing Association.
White, E.
G. (1911). The acts of the apostles. Nampa, ID: Pacific Press
Publishing Association.
White, E.
G. (1952). The Adventist home. Hagerstown, MD: Review and
Herald Publishing Association.
|